Supreme Court, state judge deny Schiavo appeals to resume feeding
Let’s see if “reinsert feeding tube”
is on the board ?
Survey Says…
Supreme Court, state judge deny appeals to resume feeding
(CNN) — Hours after the U.S. Supreme Court rejected pleas to intervene in the case of Terri Schiavo on Thursday, her parents again asked a federal judge in Florida to order the brain-damaged woman’s feeding tube restored.
Bob and Mary Schindler are asking District Judge James Whittemore — the same judge who turned down their request for an injunction to keep their daughter alive earlier this week — to reconsider that decision.
Anti-abortion rights activist Randall Terry, who is acting as a spokesman for the Schindlers, said the new motion raises “evidentiary issues that were ignored in the first crack at federal court.”
Whittemore has scheduled a hearing on the matter for 6 p.m., and Terry said the Schindlers plan to attend.
After the Supreme Court rejection, a Florida judge denied three other legal requests from Schiavo’s parents.
Schiavo has been without food or water since Pinellas-Pasco Circuit Judge George Greer ordered her feeding tube removed Friday.
Thursday, Greer denied a petition of the state Department of Children and Families and Gov. Jeb Bush to take Schiavo into state custody.
He also denied a petition from the DCF to investigate allegations that Terri Schiavo’s husband, Michael, abused her.Such allegations have been considered and dismissed several times in the past, most recently last week in the Florida Supreme Court.
Greer also rejected an affidavit, submitted by Florida authorities, from a Florida doctor who argued that the brain-damaged woman was not in a persistent vegetative state.
The U.S. Supreme Court refused to intervene after the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals twice turned down a plea from the parents that would have allowed for a feeding tube to be reinserted Wednesday.
Referring to the high court decision, George Felos, an attorney for Michael Schiavo, said: “Mr. Schiavo and all of us are very grateful for the order of the United States Supreme Court this morning. We hope that that order will effectively end the litigation effort in this case.
“We believe it’s time for that to stop … and that Mrs. Schiavo be able to die in peace.”
Justice Anthony Kennedy, who is responsible for emergency appeals from the 11th Circuit, signed the Supreme Court ruling.
The 11th Circuit, based in Atlanta, Georgia, includes Florida, where Terri Schiavo lives in a hospice in Pinellas Park.
It was the fifth time the case has been presented to the Supreme Court, which has consistently refused to hear it.
On Friday, lawyers for the House of Representatives filed an appeal asking the justices to intervene in the case. The appeal was denied without comment.
Parents’ hope ‘dimming’
Thursday afternoon, the Schindlers visited their daughter at her hospice. Terry said Mary Schindler became “physically ill” during the visit and had to leave the hospital room.
“It appears every legal option has just been exhausted,” the Rev. Patrick Mahoney, spokesman for the Schindlers, said after Thursday’s Supreme Court decision. “Governor Bush is now the only practical hope here for Terri Schiavo. We plead with Governor Bush.”
Paul O’Donnell, a spiritual adviser for the Schindlers, said, “their hope is dimming.”
“They’re very disappointed,” he said. “They’re in shock. They can’t believe this is happening. They hope the governor is going to do something, but this is a severe blow when Terri’s life hangs in the balance.”
President Bush was described by aides as disappointed Thursday at the Supreme Court’s decision. Bush was informed of the court’s action while at his Texas ranch.
Aides in Washington said there are no plans to consider any additional federal intervention in the case.
Schiavo’s parents and her husband have been at odds over the woman’s care, and the battle has drawn in religious conservatives on the side of the Schindlers to fight Michael Schiavo’s efforts to let his wife die, as he says she wanted.
More than 20 state and federal court rulings have sided with Michael Schiavo. The courts have ruled that evidence shows Terri Schiavo expressed her wishes, although she did not have a written living will.
“It saddens me that we have to run to court and get court orders to protect Terri Schiavo from the abuse of the state of Florida,” Felos said Thursday. “The conduct of the executive branch of the state of Florida has been reprehensible.”
Greer in 2002 rejected arguments put forth by doctors chosen by Schiavo’s parents that she was not in a persistent vegetative state. Three other doctors — two chosen by Michael Schiavo and one chosen by the court — concluded she was in that state.
Wednesday night, Bob Schindler accused Greer of being “on a crusade” to kill Terri.
Legal maneuvers
Last weekend, President Bush signed a bill passed by Congress moving the Schiavo case from state to federal courts, and Monday, Whittemore refused to grant a temporary restraining order that would have allowed reinsertion of the woman’s feeding tube.
Terri Schiavo suffered profound brain damage in 1990, when her heart stopped temporarily, perhaps because of an eating disorder. Since then, she has received around-the-clock care.
In 1998, her husband petitioned to have her feeding tube removed. After court rulings, the tube was removed for two days in 2001 and six days in 2003.
In 2003, the Florida Legislature passed a bill that allowed Jeb Bush to order doctors to restore Schiavo’s feeding tube six days after it had been removed. The law was later declared unconstitutional by the Florida Supreme Court.
Since last Friday, Michael Schiavo has been at Terri Schiavo’s bedside, Felos has said.
Mary Schindler said Wednesday: “When I close my eyes at night, all I can see is Terri’s face in front of me, dying, starving to death.”
CNN’s Ted Barrett, Joe Johns, Bill Mears and John Zarrella contributed to this report.
Article Available at: http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/24/schiavo/index.html
5 Comments:
I love how you’re getting more and more cynical as time goes on. 😀
lildaemon
2005.03.249:31 pm
I think there could be a much nicer way of killing this woman. I don’t think removing a feeding tube is anything really too nice, why can’t they give her like a lethal injection or some concoction of drugs to make death a lil nicer? Yeah, shes PVS but I think it would just be nicer!
lauren3113
2005.03.2512:17 am
From every report I’ve heard, this is the most humane way to let her die.
darkymoore
2005.03.259:16 am
I just don’t in anyway feel it is humane to starve anyone, PVS or no PVS! We let murderers die by a shot and this woman’s body is eating itsself.
lauren3113
2005.03.2512:31 pm
As I understand it (and I’ll ask my doctor cousins this weekend) – it relates to the doctor’s oath to do no harm. Poisoning someone’s body with a lethal injection is definitely harm. (and in fact, as I understand it, doctors don’t give lethal injections to prisoners, they use paramedics, who are not under the Hipocratic oath) Whereas the other option is to not help – which is the sole purpose of a do not resuscitate order. If the body starves to death, I believe the death certificate will read “natural causes”. Euthanizaiton is a very slippery slope in the medical profession, and they tend to stay the hell away from it whenever possible.
line21
2005.03.252:51 pm